×
Case Study

Top Mortgage Financing Enterprise Develops a Unified View of Risk

Discover how a leading financial services company overcame the challenges of risk silos, legacy systems, and inconsistent taxonomies to improve risk management maturity and visibility across the three lines of defense.

To maintain their reputation as a leading source for mortgage financing, the company is committed to innovation i.e. implementing new approaches and systems that can make mortgage processes for both borrowers and lenders as quick and effective as possible. At the same time, the company has to understand and mitigate the risks associated with their new processes and technologies. They need to have a well-defined risk appetite, so that everyone across the organization takes measured risks. They also need to have a strong risk culture across business lines to ensure that corporate goals are accomplished with a sense of integrity.

The first step towards achieving these objectives is to identify the risks associated with each process, and then set up the right risk measurement standards and indicators. All the three lines of defense need to work together towards identifying risks, understanding their impact, determining interdependencies, and finally, collating the data to provide a unified view of risks across the organization.

Region

United States

Industry

BFSI

Employees

7700+

Product

Operational Risk Management

Audit Management

Case and Incident Management

The Limitations of Silos and Manual Tools

For years, the company used several systems and manual processes for risk management, compliance, and audits. Each risk group leveraged their own tools and process libraries which were not integrated across the enterprise. The lack of a common taxonomy and risk framework meant that multiple risk management resources with different skill-sets and knowledge had to be appointed to maintain and communicate risk data. This siloed approach resulted in unnecessarily high maintenance costs. Moreover, it complicated the process of collecting and analyzing data for board-level reporting – so much so, that there was often a 2-3 month delay in the data reported.

As a result, the management and other stakeholders didn’t receive the timely risk insights they needed to understand critical risk areas and their impact on business objectives. Without this data, stakeholders found it difficult to make risk-reward optimized decisions. That’s when they turned to MetricStream to enable an integrated approach to governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) which, in turn, would facilitate a more unified and timely view of risks.

Better Consistency through a Common Risk and Control Taxonomy

MetricStream implemented a holistic GRC solution for the organization’s three lines of defense with capabilities for policy management, case management, audit management, and compliance management. The solution has since enabled teams to develop and use a common risk and control taxonomy linked to regulations, policies, audit programs, and other related metrics. Through this taxonomy, teams can easily identify, collate, and organize risk data, while understanding inherent risk relationships. They have also been able to rationalize controls, reduce testing processes, and enhance data quality.

Improved Risk Visibility across the Three Lines of Defense

With the solution’s unified risk assessment capability, the organization has been able to streamline and align risk and control assessments across audit and compliance functions. Users can leverage common risk and control assessment frameworks, methodologies, and classifications to not only improve risk visibility at the enterprise level, but to also provide an individual process-level perspective of risk across the lines of defense.

Unified risk assessments provide a single view of inherent and residual risk exposure at various levels of the organization.

 

Challenge

  • Cultural complexity in terms of bringing all the three lines of defense together on one platform.
  • Multiple silos and legacy systems.
  • Lack of a common, single risk taxonomy across all the lines of defense.
  • Difficulties with end-user adoption i.e. enabling front line users to proactively identify and report key risks and issues

Business value realized

 

Increased risk and compliance visibility and accountability; greater leadership- and board-level confidence in the organization’s risk management abilities

 

Improved risk management maturity and capabilities in the first line of defense

 

Better visibility into risks and issues throughout the enterprise

 

A more adaptable, effective, and agile approach to data governance

 

Better Assurance through Centralized Issue Monitoring and Reporting

Instead of managing risk issues and incidents in silos, the company can now integrate them on a unified platform. Stakeholders have also been able to define a common methodology for issue management across business functions, groups, and locations. The result? Fewer redundancies and inconsistencies as well as effective mitigation planning.

The three lines of defense now work together to define and approve the issue management process – including process standards, issue definition, classification, severity level, and reporting processes. This collaborative approach enables consolidated reporting to the management team who can then respond to critical issues proactively and effectively.

Greater Efficiency in Compliance

The solution enables the organization to streamline the creation, communication, review, and approval of policies across functions. It stores policies and procedures centrally, while mapping them to regulations, risks, controls, and processes. This integrated framework makes it easy for the company to identify the impact of regulatory changes on policies, while highlighting potential risks and gaps.

The solution also enables the company to manage a wide range of compliance requirements in an integrated manner. Users can efficiently perform control assessments, and identify high-risk areas as well as non-compliance incidents for remediation.

More Effective, Risk-Based Audit Processes

Through the solution, the company has enabled a systematic, structured approach to audit processes and activities, including risk-based audit planning and scheduling, field work, work paper management, issue management, and reporting. Auditors can prioritize their tasks and resources based on the areas of highest risk. They can also gain real-time insights into audit findings.

Powerful dashboards and reports enable the teams to conduct a “so-what” analysis for deep risk insights that can then be sliced and diced from different perspectives, and reported to the risk committee.

Increased Risk Consciousness in the First Line

The integrated solution gives first line users high-quality risk data and reporting mechanisms to perform their day-to-day activities effectively. It has empowered them to easily manage and report an issue, incident, or risk, while taking timely and appropriate mitigating action which can then be reviewed by the second line. Essentially, the solution and its workflows connect all the lines of defense, thereby simplifying and accelerating the flow of risk information for quick analysis and decision-making

Related Stories

Case Study

Global Insurer Transforms Compliance With Better Intelligence, Automation, and Risk Awareness

Case Study

Leading Sports Footwear and Apparel Company Automates IT and Cyber Risk and Compliance

Case Study

Blue Cross Blue Shield Affiliates Adopt an Integrated Approach to Intensify Overall Compliance, Risk and Audit Management

lets-talk-img

Ready to get started?

Speak to our experts Let’s talk