We are now operating in what the US military terms a VUCA environment, or a market context that is marked by Volatility, Uncertainty, Chaos, and Ambiguity. Modern risks are increasingly black swan events that have far reaching impact across sectors, geographies, and ecosystems. A threat in one corner of the world can set off a global chain reaction almost immediately.
These forces create a risk context that traditional risk management approaches cannot effectively address, because these programs tend to be reactive, threat or compliance-focused, with a narrow scope. They are not designed to detect threats of this kind or respond in real time. And they are ill-equipped to quickly identify or mitigate interconnected risks with the potential to escalate in magnitude. Risk leaders need more forward-looking strategies that can anticipate and prepare for emerging risks, and ensure a cross-functional, unified approach to risk management.
The Systemic Risk Council identifies geopolitical instability, political uncertainty, macroeconomic disruption, and AI-driven security risks as the major interconnected risks for 2025. But interconnected risks are only one part of the problem. Organizations also need to watch out for strategic risk events that cause significant loss in market value.
Strategic risks emerge as a result of events, decisions, or situations that tend to tie to the strategic plan and can often impede an enterprise from achieving its goals and business objectives. These can be unexpected black swan events like the COVID-19 pandemic that disrupted supply chains and put global economies under unprecedented pressure. They can be strategic focus areas that can morph into operational crises, such as cybersecurity threats. Or they can even be geopolitical conflicts that disrupt critical sectors like energy, food security, and cause significant human suffering.
Regardless of the trigger, strategic risks are highly complex and unexpected. They often emerge and spread quickly, and their typical profiles often make it hard to predict or model their frequency or severity. There is less time to react, greater impact uncertainty, and higher stakes, all of which can impact decision-making and operational and strategic outcomes.
Traditional ERM systems operate on structured processes across established risk categories and are typically aligned with compliance requirements. They can meet regulatory mandates efficiently as they can handle known and more predictable risks. The trouble is, emerging strategic risks run the gamut from black swans to white elephants 1 , both difficult to predict and thus difficult to mitigate. Traditional ERM systems simply cannot keep pace with evolving strategic risks, as:
Enterprises need to focus on forward-looking, predictive ERM rather than static, backward looking, compliance-oriented approaches, to meet the challenges posed by the current volatile and complex risk landscape.
An intelligent ERM strategy must use real-time data and advanced analytics not just to protect the business but also to help organizations benefit from faster, better decision making abilities. Here are the 3 essential pillars of intelligent ERM for managing strategic risks:
The three-pillar approach helps establish a robust data and risk foundation across the enterprise with high levels of executive and board engagement. Most importantly, it embeds ERM into the heart of everyday decision-making across levels, helping establish a risk-aware culture that is critical for faster identification and mitigation of emerging risks.
It goes without saying that intelligent ERM needs artificial intelligence (AI) powered systems that can embed data-backed intelligence into every decision and enable real-time monitoring and adaptivity. AI enhances the organization’s ability to detect hidden risks that might otherwise go unnoticed and take risk management strategies from defensive to proactive, ensuring agility, resilience, and competitive advantage. An AI-powered ERM system must include:
While AI holds tremendous potential, it is critical to remain cognizant that it is a double edged sword reshaping the risk landscape itself. AI can introduce new risks like model drift, cybersecurity vulnerabilities, algorithmic bias, and ethical challenges. And it is already being exploited by threat actors to launch highly sophisticated attacks and to obscure reality from fantasy.
Organizations must establish the proper guardrails around the use of AI in ERM. This includes robust cybersecurity measures, governance frameworks, and human oversight. In fact, I would go as far as to say that AI models must always work with a human in the loop. AI, and especially emerging agentic AI models, will doubtless be used to automate routine tasks with efficiency as the target. But for more sophisticated, even strategic applications, review and approval must rest with humans. Most importantly, organizations must first identify gaps and use cases, then deploy automation for reporting and insights, and finally embed AI-driven orchestration across ERM process components, while maintaining human oversight and interpretation.
Traditional ERM approaches that worked well for decades are no longer enough to address fast-moving, interconnected risks. Enterprises must shift from static, reactive defenses to proactive, intelligent risk management strategies. By balancing the speed and foresight of AI with the intuition and judgment of human leaders, organizations can build resilience, safeguard reputation, and turn risk management into a true source of competitive advantage.
Join Chris Mandel at his exclusive workshop at the GRC Summit 2025 in Las Vegas on November 17-18. Don't miss this opportunity to deepen your understanding of complex risk management powered by AI. Register now to secure your spot and be part of the future of governance, risk, and compliance!
[1] https://jameslam.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/NACD-Cover-Article_Animal-Kingdom_Lam-Jan-Feb-2019.pdf
[2] source: Excellence in Risk Management, LLC