Geopolitical tensions, cyberattacks, climate change, economic slowdowns, the risk events keep coming at organizations hard and fast. Regulators and stakeholders are responding with calls for stronger operational resilience. But what does resilience actually look like in the modern enterprise? And how can GRC leaders ensure that it’s designed in, not bolted on?
These were some of the questions we explored in a recent MetricStream-hosted webinar on ‘Resilient GRC by Design – Reimagine Your Resilience Strategy with AI and Best Practices’. Michael Rasmussen, GRC 20/20 analyst, and I discussed resilience in detail as the flexibility and elasticity that allows businesses to bounce back faster from a risk event.
He also challenged organizations to consider the kind of future we’re heading towards. Will it be a Blade Runner-like dystopia or a more hopeful and cooperative Star Trek-like future? The decisions we make today around governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) will shape the outcome and our capacity to be resilient.
Here are 8 key takeaways from the webinar:
As businesses, we’re built to take risks. Our purpose isn’t to sit idle in port, but to venture out in pursuit of opportunities. Uncertainties and storms will be inevitable, but that’s where resilience comes in. It helps us weather the turbulence, absorb the shocks, and keep moving forward.
Resilience is especially important in today’s chaotic world, where everything changes so quickly. Regulations are shifting, which means policies and controls have to be updated regularly. New risks are also emerging all the time, whether it’s an environmental risk like a wildfire or a geopolitical conflict that then triggers additional risks to commodity prices, supply chains, and so on.
Businesses, too, are continuously changing in terms of strategies, processes, and technologies. Resilience is the ability to adapt fast, and stay steady amidst all this change, to navigate chaos without losing direction.
Too many risk and resilience management programs operate like drivers fixated on the rearview mirror. They’re focused more on past events than on what lies ahead. This leaves organizations unprepared for emerging threats and undermines their ability to build resilience.
While historical data is important, true resilience demands forward-looking awareness. We as organizations need to know where we’re going, what our objectives are, and what could hamper the achievement of those goals. We also need to see what’s developing on the horizon in terms of upcoming regulations or emerging risks. The more attuned we are to the road ahead, the better-prepared we will be to respond and thrive amidst uncertainty.
Resilience-building is about engaging both sides of the brain — the structured, analytical side and the creative, intuitive side. We use left-brain thinking to model potential risk, run Monte Carlo simulations, and quantify risk impact.
But by themselves, these methods don’t fully capture the complexity and unpredictability of the real world. We also need the imaginativeness of right-brain thinking to ask: What can go wrong? What’s missing? What’s changed in the real world? What if the risk model we used no longer applies?
By combining this kind of creative foresight with rigorous analysis, organizations can more effectively build the risk agility and resilience needed to navigate the unexpected.
The ancient Greeks built the Tunnel of Eupalinos by digging from both sides of a mountain, and still managed to meet perfectly in the middle. That’s the kind of alignment organizations need in risk management. A top-down approach helps leaders understand risks in the context of strategy and business objectives. Meanwhile, a bottom-up approach captures risks emerging deep within processes, systems, and frontline activities.
Too often, these perspectives are managed separately, resulting in misaligned priorities. Resilience requires that both be connected with precision. When top-down and bottom-up approaches are synchronized, organizations gain a more complete picture of risk that supports smarter decisions and quicker risk responses.
Managing risk and resilience in silos is like building a house with no blueprint. You end up with fragmented processes, overlapping controls, and critical blind spots. Data gets lost across thousands of spreadsheets, documents, and emails. So, by the time it’s aggregated and consolidated, the risks have already amplified.
True resilience demands integration. This is especially critical in today’s hyperconnected world, where risks intersect in complex ways. The best way to stay ahead of them is to break down silos and build a unified risk view.
We also need greater alignment across functions like GRC, IT security, business continuity, quality management, third-party governance, and environment, health, and safety (EHS). This doesn’t mean collapsing all functions into a single group, but coordinating their efforts through shared processes, technologies, and goals. The end goal is to act as one enterprise in the face of disruption.
The primary focus of any GRC and resilience program is to help the organization achieve its objectives. These objectives could be strategic, operational, financial, regulatory, or even ESG-related. Some may be process-level objectives, while others may be department-level objectives. Either way, they’re all important in moving the organization forward.
That’s exactly why GRC and resilience efforts must be grounded in a deep understanding of the business: its operations, processes, and services. A generic GRC checklist or one-size-fits-all risk register won’t cut it anymore. We have to embed GRC in the rhythms and patterns of the organization. This means engaging business leaders across functions—whether it’s marketing, sales, operations, or IT—to understand their objectives and the risks that could threaten them. Without this alignment, resilience initiatives could lose focus and fail to protect what really matters.
Resilience-building isn’t a one-time exercise but a continuous loop of structured activities. It starts with identifying risks that may affect the organization’s ability to meet its objectives. These risks are then assessed using a blend of analytical techniques, such as Monte Carlo simulations and bow-tie assessments.
From there, we move into risk treatment, i.e., deciding whether to mitigate, transfer, avoid, or accept each risk based on its impact. We also monitor the risks as conditions change. At every touchpoint, risk communication and attestation help ensure that risk owners stay informed and engaged.
Done right, this end-to-end process enables organizations to stay ahead of potential disruptions, make informed decisions, and confidently pursue opportunities.
Building resilience at scale is no longer possible with spreadsheets and legacy systems. Organizations need mature, agile, and low-code/ no-code solutions.
An AI-first, connected GRC platform can connect multiple risk and resilience processes, ranging from enterprise risk management to business continuity planning, in a single source of truth. It can also provide a 360-degree contextual view of risks and how they relate to business objectives.
The right GRC technology improves efficiency and cost savings, helps contain risk issues, and allows organizations to navigate the road ahead with agility. Cognitive GRC powered by AI takes things one step further. With capabilities like predictive analytics, AI helps organizations accurately forecast risk, simulate outcomes, and identify key patterns in data that support quicker risk responses.
MetricStream’s AI-first Connected GRC platform strengthens resilience by enabling organizations to anticipate, withstand, respond to, and recover from risk events in an intelligent and agile way.
Ready to learn more? Request a demo now.